USADA, will continuous glucose monitoring improve performance?

Commentary from the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency on continuous glucose monitoring for athletes. It states plainly that there is no scientific consensus on whether real-time blood-sugar feedback actually produces measurable performance improvements, and warns that normal post-exercise glucose swings are physiological rather than necessarily a fuelling problem, so misreading the data could push an athlete to over-restrict food. Its position is that CGM data may inform decisions but should not override internal signals or replace individualised professional advice. Authoritative body commentary rather than a study; useful for the plain-language point that CGM is unproven for non-diabetics, and for the over-interpretation caution.